In the Courts

Research on the growing racial turnout gap cited by Justice Samuel Alito's majority opinion in Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 601 U.S. ___ (2024), a redistricting case in which the Court upheld a challenged South Carolina congressional map.
In Louisiana v. Callais, 608 U.S. ___ (2026), Justice Alito’s majority opinion claimed that Black voter turnout had exceeded white turnout in two of the last five presidential elections, citing a DOJ amicus brief that used a misleading methodology. My analysis identifying this claim as false—published the day after the decision—became the factual basis for a Guardian investigation and widespread national coverage challenging the opinion’s empirical foundations.
My research and reports on voter purges, the effects of Shelby County v. Holder, and the effects of voting laws and policies has been cited in state and federal voting rights litigation.

In Congress

Testimony before the U.S. House Committee on House Administration, Subcommittee on Elections (June 11, 2021), on the effects of polling place closures, long wait times, and voting restrictions on political participation, with a focus on racial disparities in election day experiences.
Research on the racial turnout gap, voter purges, and the effects of restrictive voting legislation cited in congressional statements, committee reports, and the legislative record surrounding proposed Voting Rights Act amendments.

In Policy Debates

The SAVE Act. A 2024 analysis (co-authored with Cora Henry) finding that 21 million Americans lack readily available documentary proof of citizenship was cited by multiple U.S. senators during floor debate, evaluated by FactCheck.org, and covered by major national outlets.
Shelby County and the racial turnout gap. My ongoing research documenting widening racial turnout gaps—based on individual voter records covering every federal general election since 2008—has become a foundational reference in advocacy for restoring Section 5 preclearance protections.
Texas SB 1. Research documenting the racially disparate effects of Texas's mail voting restrictions informed public understanding and legal challenges to SB 1.